A group of whistleblowers has accused the Federal Government of failing to protect them.

As former Afghan war crimes whistleblower David McBride prepares for his trial in Canberra, a coalition of prominent whistleblowers has penned an open letter to the Australian federal government, condemning the broken system that leaves whistleblowers vulnerable to legal fees and other hardships.

David McBride, who exposed war crimes allegations by special forces in Afghanistan, faces a criminal trial with potential life imprisonment if found guilty. 

His case has ignited a debate on the treatment of whistleblowers.

The open letter, signed by whistleblowers such as Jeff Morris and Peter Fox, argues that the government's record on protecting whistleblowers is lacklustre, and its promises have been empty. 

They express concern that Mr McBride's prosecution discourages prospective whistleblowers, urging the government to protect, not prosecute, those who expose wrongdoing.

Since taking office in May 2022, the Albanese Government has not made meaningful progress in safeguarding whistleblowers, and instead, it has exposed them to exorbitant legal costs. 

The letter details how several whistleblowers faced significant financial burdens for exposing the truth.

Despite their efforts to address internal concerns before going public, both David McBride and ATO whistleblower Richard Boyle have faced prosecution, which the letter deems disgraceful. 

It highlights the government's use of Section 71B of the Judiciary Act to halt the prosecution of Bernard Collaery in a similar context.

Kieran Pender, a senior lawyer at the Human Rights Law Centre, has called for whistleblowers' protection and criticised the impending trial of David McBride. 

Recent public support, campaigns, and polls indicate widespread support for stronger legal protections and whistleblower rights.

The whistleblower community stands united behind McBride and Boyle, advocating for their protection. In a show of solidarity, a rally is planned as McBride's trial commences.

While it is anticipated that McBride's trial will garner significant media attention, the outcome could have a chilling effect on potential future whistleblowers. 

The government's response will be closely scrutinised, as it has the power to halt the trial and address the broader issue of whistleblower protection. 

Mr McBride remains resolute, saying he is prepared to face the consequences of his actions with his head held high.