Australia's climate policies are under fire as scientists accuse the government of hypocrisy. 

While claiming commitment to climate action and supporting renewable energy, there is still no clear strategy to phase out fossil fuels, resulting in a ‘cognitive dissonance’, according to experts.

A recent Climate Council review suggests Australia should cut carbon emissions by 75 per cent by 2030, well beyond the government's 43 per cent target. 

The review also calls for achieving net-zero emissions by 2035, earlier than the current 2050 goal, in line with other analyses.

Despite some advocating for nuclear energy, it faces challenges, including cost and legal constraints. A predominantly renewable energy grid is considered optimal.

While electricity-related pollution has decreased, emissions from transport and major industries rise. 

The report highlights the need for comprehensive emissions reductions, impossible with new coal and gas projects and carbon offset claims.

Australia's choices are stark: be a global leader by halting fossil fuel exports, embracing renewables, and setting an example or continue contributing to global emissions.

The Climate Council's report aligns with an open letter signed by over 200 experts urging Australia to cease support for new fossil fuel projects, emphasising the country's “special responsibility” in the emissions crisis.

The government claims ambition and achievability in its climate plans, but the urgency remains in question.